Relationship agreements carry out often mean the period of time within the hence amarriage ought to have taken lay
step one. But really, for the genealogy and family history, most of us knowthat per code there is an exception. A good vexing part ofgenealogy is that not one person really knows just how to utilize the new exceptions orrules with any definitive adjective including constantly, possibly, probably,likely, an such like. It might be fascinating in the event the around most other instances ofjointures getting generated annually or several after a known relationships time.
2. Is there an extant dispensation towards the relationships regarding ElizabethClifford and you may Sir Ralph Bowes who have been third cousins thru Henry Fitzhugh,third Lord Fitzhugh otherwise last cousins, shortly after taken from the newest 5th LordClifford? Who would narrow down their marriage time.
Arthur
Presumably, when the an excellent dispensation was sought for and offered, it would havebeen because of the among the following, and can even can be found in new correspondingregister publication, whether it endures:
Thomas Savage, Archbishop out-of York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop out-of Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop away from York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop off Durham 1502-1505Thomas amolatina dating sites Ruthall, Bishop out of Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop off Carlisle 1502-1508John Cent, Bishop off Carlisle 1509-1520
5. Whether your tenth Lord Clifford does get married in early 1487 [say January] andhas E afterwards where season, really does the latest chronology maybe not works?
John palms?
Elizabeth created for the late 1487, Henry born within the 1488/9, Joan in the ,etcetera. filling out the newest names of your own posting out of . When the (a) thechronology nonetheless performs; and you will (b) her matrimony section wasn’t lower; thenwe only have the brand new 1505 pedigree from Henry VII’s which is within the oppositionto the newest supposition one she was a valid child.
six. Regarding the 1505 pedigree: Would be the Clifford daughters the fresh new onlyknown Henry VII interactions omitted? Have there been anybody else? If that’s the case,won’t one echo defectively on this subject file as a resource?
Regarding evaluations I have produced from the brand new c.1505 Henry VII Relations pedigreeswith the brand new 1480-1500 Visitation of your North pedigrees, that are
About c.1505 Relations pedigrees, the fresh new Clifford youngsters are perhaps not listedin an excellent Clifford pedigree, but alternatively on the St. John pedigree. As the I’mnot accustomed the brand new St. John household members, pursuing the is the advice asit seems regarding c.1505 pedigree, because obtained from the fresh 1834 Coll. Best. etGen. post. The latest phrasing into the quotations is exactly because it looks inthe 1834 post (pp. 310-311).
“Zero. XII.”From my Lord Welles daughter, Sir Richard Pole, Domme Verney, SirJohn St. John, together with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess away from Somerset had about three husbands.” Because of the “John Duke ofSomerset” she had “My personal Lady the new King’s Mom.” who’d “Brand new King.” whohad “Prince “From the “Sir Oliver Saint John, earliest husband.” she got 3 daus & dos sons:
Good. “Edith, married so you’re able to Geoffrey Pole off Buckinghamshire.” They’d:A1. “Sir Richard Rod, Knt. married into Woman Margaret, dau. regarding theDuke out of Clarence.” That they had: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, married so you can Ralph Verney, Esq.” That they had: “John Verney.—– [child, unnamed]. ——-[an alternate youngster, unnamed].”
B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He had five pupils:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” who had “Four daughters and you will oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. so you’re able to Harry Lord Clifford.” They had “Jane. Mabill.Henry, son and heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “Elizabeth, wedded to help you Thomas Kent, Esq. of Lincolnshire.”B4. “A beneficial Nun out-of Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”
C. “Dame Mary, wedded so you’re able to Sir Richard Frognall.” They’d:C1. “Edmond Frognall and his awesome brethren and you may sistren.” Which have issueindicated, although not titled.C2. “Elizabeth, married to Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”
D. “E, wedded earliest towards Lord Zouche; immediately following to your LordScrope away from Bolton.” Issue:D1. [by Zouche] ” Catesby.” They had:”E. George. John. William.”D2. [of the Scrope] ” Conyers.” Having issueindicated yet not entitled.
Margaret Duchess of Somerset, from the “Lionel Lord Welles, past husband.”had: “John Viscount Welles, wedded Cecily, dau. away from K. Edward IV.” andthey got “Age.”